So sánh ryzen 5 2600 vs i3 9100f

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i3-9100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingPlace by popularityValue for money21.9517.48Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processorSeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Core i3Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Release date13 April 2018 (5 years old)23 April 2019 (4 years old)Launch price (MSRP)$199$122Current price$156 (0.8x MSRP)$115 (0.9x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 26% better value for money than i3-9100F.

Technical specs

Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)Threads124Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHzBoost clock speed3.9 GHz4.2 GHzL1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)L2 cache3 MB256K (per core)L3 cache16 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)Chip lithography12 nm14 nmDie size192 mm2126 mm2Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °CMaximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °CNumber of transistors4,800 millionno data64 bit support++Windows 11 compatibility++Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1SocketAM4FCLGA1151Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2AES-NI++AVX++Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-TSXno data-TSXno data+Idle Statesno data+Thermal Monitoringno data+SIPPno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-EDBno data+Secure Keyno data+MPXno data+Identity Protectionno data+SGXno dataYes with Intel® MEOS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++VT-dno data+VT-xno data+EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4Maximum memory size128 GB64 GBMax memory channels22Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s37.5 GB/sECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe version3.03.0PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 96% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

Ryzen 5 2600 13212

+95.9%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 96% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 40%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 40%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 32% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 38% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 2600 28173

+55.5%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 55% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 115% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 155% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 97% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 9% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 11% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 150% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 11% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 6% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 69% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 8.63 4.41 Recency 13 April 2018 23 April 2019 Physical cores 6 (Hexa-Core) 4 (Quad-Core) Threads 12 4 Cost $199 $122 Boost clock speed 3900 4200 Base clock speed 3400 3600 Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm

The Ryzen 5 2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-9100F in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i3-9100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Ryzen 5 2600

Core i3-9100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate Intel Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.