What does the research indicate about gender differences in learning disabilities?

References

  • Ackerman, P., Peters, J., and Dykman, R. 1971. Children with specific learning disabilities: WISC profiles.Journal of Learning Disabilities 4:150–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A. 1981. Recategorized WISC-R scores of disabled and adequate readers.Journal of Educational Research 75:109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannatyne, A. 1968. Diagnosing learning disabilities and writing remedial prescriptions.Journal of Learning Disabilities 1:242–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannatyne, A. 1974. Diagnosis: A note on recategorization of the WISC scaled scores.Journal of Learning Disabilities 7:272–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M., Yule, W., and Rutter, M. 1975. Attainment and adjustment in two geographical areas II the prevalence of specific reading retardation.British Journal of Psychiatry 126:510–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C., Shaywitz, S., and Shaywitz, B. 1985. Girls with attention deficit disorder: A silent minority? A report on behavioral and cognitive characteristics.Pediatrics 76:801–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, J. 1987. Intellectual levels and patterns.In D. Johnson and J. Blalock [eds.].Young Adults with Learning Disabilities: Clinical studies. Orlando: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, P., Wright, S., Walker, C., and Ross, J. 1975. Performance on the WISC as a function of sex of E, six of S and age of S.Journal of Psychology 90:51–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimer, M. 1969. Sex differences in listening comprehension.Journal of Research and Development in Education 3:72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, M., and Wolf, J. 1986. A comprehensive study of learning disabled adults.Journal of Learning Disabilities 19:34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. 1983.Stages of Reading Development. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordoni, B., O’Donnell, J., Ramaniah, N., Kurtz, J., and Rosenshein, K. 1981. Wechsler adult intelligence score patterns for learning disabled young adults.Journal of Learning Disabilities 14:404–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno, D. 1982. Sex differences in cognition: A review and critique of the longitudinal evidence.Adolescence 17:779–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eno, L., and Woehlke, P. 1980. Diagnostic differences between educationally handicapped and learning disabled students.Psychology in the School 17:469–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finucci, J. M., and Childs, B. 1981. Are there really more dyslexic boys than girls?In A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert, and N. Gartrell [eds.].Sex Differences in Dyslexia. Baltimore, Maryland: Orton Dyslexia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaburda, A. 1986. Animal studies and the neurology of developmental dyslexia.In G. Pavlidis and D. Fisher [eds.].Dyslexia: Its neuropsychology and treatment. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschwind, N. 1981. A reaction of conference.In A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert and N. Gartrell [eds.].Sex Differences in Dyslexia. Baltimore: Orton Dyslexia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschwind, N. 1986. Dyslexia, cerebral dominance, autoimmunity and sex hormones.In G. Pavlidis and D. Fisher [eds.].Dyslexia: Its neuropsychology and treatment. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A. 1977. Sex differences in Israeli Kibbutz system: Reading disabilities, maturation and sex role standards. Dissertation Abstracts International 38A: 1998.

  • Hagin, R. 1983. Early intervention with vulnerable children: Results of a demonstration project. Paper read at 91st Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 1983, Anaheim.

  • Holowinsky, I., and Pascale, P. 1972. Performance on selected WISC subtests of subjects referred for psychological evaluation because of educational difficulties.Journal of Special Education 6:231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. 1967. Education principles for children with learning disabilities.Rehabilitation Literature 28:317–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., and Wollersheim, J. 1977. WISC patterns and other characteristics of reading disabled children.Perceptual and Motor Skills 45:729–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. 1975. Factor analysis of the WISC-R at 11 age levels between 6 1/2 and 16 1/2 years.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 43:135–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. 1976a. A new approach to the interpretation of test scatter on the WISC-R.Journal of Learning Disabilities 9:160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. 1976b. Verbal-performance IQ discrepancies on the WISC-R.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 44:739–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. 1981. The WISC-R Learning Disabilities Assessment: State of the Art.Journal of Learning Disabilities 14:520–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, C., and Lee, N. 1972. A transcultural study of dyslexia: Analysis of language disabilities in 177 Chinese children simultaneously learning to read and write in English and in Chinese.Journal of Special Education 6:9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolligian, J., and Sternberg, R. 1987. Intelligence, information processing, and specific learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities 20:8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N., and Sandoval, J. 1980. The prevalence of learning disabilities in a sample of children considered hyperactive.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 8:33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, J., and Inglis, J. 1984. The psychometric assessment of children with learning disabilities: An index derived from a principal components analysis of the WISC-R.Journal of Learning Disabilities 17:517–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., and Fuller, G. 1972. Sex differences on psychoeducational tests with three classified deficit reading groups.Slow Learning Child 19:165–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. 1974.The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. [5th ed.]. 1972.Wechsler’s Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, A., and Roberts, A. 1985. A study of WISC-R subtest scores of learning disabled students.Research Report ED 262545.

  • McGee, M. 1982. Cognitive sex differences and their practical implications. Paper read at 90th Annual American Psychological Association Convention, August 1982, Washington, D.C.

  • McGuinness, D. 1985.When Children Don’t Learn: Understanding the biology and psychology of learning disabilities. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milich, R., and Loney, J. 1979. The factor composition of the WISC for hyperkinetic MBC males.Journal of Learning Disabilities 14:520–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlidis, M. G. 1986. Personal communication, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Phipps, P. 1982. The LD learner is often a boy—why?Academic Therapy 17:425–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rie, E., and Rie, H. 1979. Reading deficits and intellectual patterns among children with neurocognitive dysfunctions.Intelligence 3:383–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogan, L., and Hartman, L. 1976. A follow-up study of learning disabled children as adults.Final Report. Evanston, Illinois: Cover School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugel, R. 1974. WISC subtest scores of disabled readers: A review with respect to Bannatyne’s recategorization.Journal of Learning Disabilities 7:48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryckman, D. 1981. Sex differences in a sample of learning disabled children.Learning Disability Quarterly 4:48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. 1982.Assessment of Children’s Intelligence and Special Abilities. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. 1987. Information processing theory and learning disabilities: An overview.Journal of Learning Disabilities 20:3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittemore, J., Lawson, J., and Inglis, J. 1985. Validation of a learning disability index derived from a principal components analysis of the WISC-R.Journal of Learning Disabilities 18:449–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafton, R., and Garrison, W. 1982. Male-female differences in cognitive abilities in various age groups.Tech. Report 1982-83, Boston: Johnson O’Connor Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, H., Singer, M., and Engin, A. 1980. WISC-R subtest differences for male and female LD children and youth.Journal of Learning Disabilities 36:953–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. A. 1985. Learning disabled college students: Identification, assessment, and outcomes.In D. Duane and C. K. Leong [eds.].Understanding Learning Disabilities: International and multidisciplinary views. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. A. 1986. Levels and patterns of intellectual functioning among LD college students: Clinical and educational implications.Journal of Learning Disabilities 19:71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. 1955.Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. 1958.The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M., and Peterson, A. [eds.] 1979.Sex-Related Differences in Cognitive Functioning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

What does the research indicate about gender differences in ADHD quizlet?

boys are 3 times more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD than girls. boys tend to be more aggressive, which will more likely result in attention by mental health professionals. girls with ADHD, tend to display more behaviors referred to as internalizing, specifically anxiety and depression.

What is the gender ratio of the specific learning disorders?

Gender ratios The observed proportion of boys and girls was compared to the proportion in the representative sample [50.6% male]. More boys than girls showed isolated spelling deficits and combined reading and spelling deficits, while more girls were impaired in arithmetic [AD only and AD+SD].

Why are boys more likely to have a learning disability?

Many theories have been proposed to explain why more boys than girls are identified as having learning disabilities. Some experts propose that the difference has to do with biological vulnerability, meaning that boys really are more often born with or acquire a tendency for a learning disability early in life.

What is the most common problem characterizing children with learning disabilities?

Reading difficulties are observed among students with learning disabilities more than any other problem area of academic performance. It is the most prevalent type of academic difficulty for students with learning disabilities.

Chủ Đề