Why do authoritarian regimes hold elections quizlet?

- The principle that a sate should be governed by law and not arbitrary decisions made by individual government officals (Rule OF Law -democratic rather than Rule BY Law -authoritarian)

- Degree of state influence on or control of the media

- The degree and practice of free and fair elections

- The degree of transparency of governmentala decision making

- The nature of citizen pariticpation of government

Upgrade to remove ads

Only SGD 41.99/year

  • Flashcards

  • Learn

  • Test

  • Match

  • Flashcards

  • Learn

  • Test

  • Match

Terms in this set (26)

Extractive vs. Inclusive Institutions

inclusive economic and political institutions are where everyone is allowed to participate, extractive are where not everyone is allowed to participate;

vicious and virtuous cycles tend to keep a nation's institutions either both inclusive or both exclusive;

vicious cycles reduce the possibility of a democratic transition and are one theory of authoritarian resilience

Public vs. Private Goods

Private goods are salaries, mansions, or poiltical impunity given to only a small group of people such as a group of elites or a autocrat's board of trustees. Private goods keep the coalition happy and reduce the risk of a top-down revolution

Public goods are stocks, economic growth, or infrastructure given to the public. Public goods keep the public happy and reduce the risk of a bottom-up revolution

Deciding between the two often depends on the size of the winning coalition.

Authoritarian Cycling vs. Democratic Transition

Authoritarian cycling is when an authoritarian regime is replaced by another authoritarian regime

Democratic transition is when an autocracy is replaced by a democracy

however some failed autocracies linger as failed states

both cycling and transitions can be categorized as either top-down, where the elites or leaders cause the regime or end, or bottom-up, where the people cause the regime to end

Illiberal Democracy vs. Liberal Autocracy

Liberal Autocracy:
* weak political rights
* moderate civil rights
* liberty of organization and expression
* no vote

Illiberal Democracy:
* moderate political rights
* weak civil rights
* no liberty of organization or expression
*ability to vote

many functioning democracies today started out as liberal autocracies, very few examples of illiberal democracies becoming functioning democracies

Bureaucratic Authoritarianism

A single-party regime that does not revolve around a central ideology, but rather a viewpoint that all the elites share and govern from.

example: China

Electoral Authoritarianism

Authoritarians hold elections for:
* information & fewer miscalculations
* focal points, what areas they need to do more work in
* reduces chances of a coup

Authoritarian Resilience

How authoritarian regimes thrive rather than just survive, A regime is resilient if it would win an election even with legitimate competition,

Theories of resilience are:
vicious cycles through extractive institutions
power sharing (China)
popular autocrats (Putin in Russia)
party strength/organization (Egypt and Malaysia)

Input Institutions

...

Reversal of fortunes

When a regime is able set up extractive institutions and make a large fortune from them. But down the line, a lack of economic growth catches up with the state and it suffers.

Cooptation vs. Power Sharing

Cooptation is when a regime provides incentives for an opposition to join the regime in order to decrease the chances of losing power.

Power Sharing is when a Single-party regime has institutions that assure that leaders at the top of the party can credibly share power in order to make intentions easier to see and to decrease the possibility that one particular elite does not try to consolidate power and create a Personal regime

Preference Falsification

preference falsification is when the public does not reveal to the regime its true thoughts on the regime's actions and leadership

occurs because of the potential costs of speaking truthfully

one of the main reasons as to why regime collapse is so hard to predict

Peaceful Evolution

Theory in which US undermines and converts a socialist nation to democracy by spreading western ideas and inciting public unrest, hoping that the public will slowly but peacefully demand more and more as time goes on

Benevolent Despot

improbable and hard to attain form of government in which an authoritarian leader puts the citizens first by investing in infrastructure, providing plenty of public goods, and installing institutions that lead to political growth, and assuring strong civil liberties among other things.

Thought of as the 'ideal form of government'. But because of its improbability, democracy is the next best thing.

Hard to attain because it is hard to know the needs and desires of all the people and many of them are conflicting.

Resource Curse

Nations with an abundance of extractable resources (gas, oil, minerals) tend to have state-operated companies extracting the resource, resulting in a lack of economic competition, resulting in a lack of economic growth

one of the major arguments as to why oil rich nations such as Saudi Arabia and Venezuela cannot be democratic

Coup-Proofing

Measures taken by an authoritarian leader to decrease the chances of a revolution, specifically a top-down one, since they are the easiest to initiate and therefore the main concern.

consist of

Selectorate

Selectorate is the people that have a say in who the leader is. In nations that hold elections, the selectorate is the public. In non-electing nations, it is usually party members.

The key to maintaining an authoritarian regime is a large selectorate, but a small winning coalition.

Winning Coalition

The winning coalition is the people that vote for or nominate a winning candidate.

When a winning coalition is large, as in a democracy, the leader will most likely spend on public goods.

When a winning coalition is small, as in a dictatorship, the leader will most likely spend of private goods.

What are the differences between Personalist, Military, and Single-party regimes? Which type are the most durable and why?

A personalist regime revolves around a single charismatic leader. the regime often dies with the leader

A military regime revolves around a military leader who has seized power in a coup. The leader often gives up power within a number of years of taking over, as he is assured legitimacy and power as part of the military.

A single-party regime revolves around an ideology or a viewpoint and is ruled by small group of party elites. Tends to last the longest as the ideology/viewpoint lives beyond the members and spans generations of leaders.

Why do Muslim majority countries tend to have lower levels of democracy?

Muslim majority countries tend to have lower levels of democracy because of their oppression of women, which leads to a large democratic deficit as a large group of citizens are not represented equally.

What are the necessary and sufficient conditions for a successful democratic transition?

To be considered a democracy: a nation must:
* have ex-ante uncertain elections
* have ex-post irreversible elections
* have repeatable elections
* have an election for the chief executive

How can we best explain the behavior of authoritarian leaders?

Authoritarian leaders are generally office-seeking, meaning their actions are motivated entirely by the desire to keep power.

One rule is to never sacrifice the interests of your supporters

This explains why authoritarians often kill off any competent elites, as they are seen as a threat to authoritarian power.

What are the various ways an authoritarian regime can influence the outcomes of elections?

* they can change the results after the fact
* they can register imaginary voters to inflate their votes
* they can declare the election null and void if they lose
* they can offer incentives for the public to vote for them
* they can threaten the public if they don't vote for them
* they can install voting taxes so only the wealthy can vote

Why was the fall of the Soviet Union so hard to predict?

It was hard to predict because there was a high amount of preference falsification and nobody knew how displeased the public was with the regime

What do all stable single-party regimes have in common?

They all have power-sharing institutions to constrain personalistic leaders

Under what conditions might we expect N. Korea or China to democratize?

China might be slowly democratizing (i.e. peaceful evolution) but it could reform politically as it has rather strong inclusive economic institutions. Theory says that either its economic or political policy will eventually change.

North Korea is rather far from democratizing as it has strong exclusive political and economic institutions. It would probably take external intervention in order to democratize North Korea.

"no famine has ever occurred under a functioning democracy" explain this.

famine takes a long time to develop. Under a functioning democracy, the institutions would step in before a famine came to be.

Sets with similar terms

CP CH 6: Nondemocratic regimes

40 terms

sydsyd190

POLI 130 Midterm 2

79 terms

trentwmyers

Unit III Lurching Democracies Vocabulary -- Russia

89 terms

delf

POS200 CHAPTER 6

18 terms

CrystalTudor25

Sets found in the same folder

Representative Democracy

7 terms

Incose

History (color revolutions)

17 terms

gabrieljon14

Other sets by this creator

PSC 308

24 terms

orangeman333

Italian Vocab 3-4

47 terms

orangeman333

Italian chapters 1-2

123 terms

orangeman333

Other Quizlet sets

muscles of arms, legs, and hips McNew la…

47 terms

aprich58

Biology Quiz 6

10 terms

Slypopz

EMT MIDTERM

118 terms

lexirond

Chapter 3- Honors Chemistry

45 terms

briannacelestre

Related questions

QUESTION

The Chinese Communist Party has about 73 million members, which means that

2 answers

QUESTION

which general regions of the world are subjected to the most "climate vulnerability"?

3 answers

QUESTION

The symbol of the people, their formal representative both nationally and internationally that embodies and articulates the goals of the regime, is the:

5 answers

QUESTION

It is the process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale.

3 answers

What is an authoritarian regime quizlet?

Authoritarian Regime. - invest political authority into a small group of individuals who exercise the authority without any constitutional responsibility to the public. - no constitutional mechanism to replace current government.

What is the purpose of authoritarian government?

Authoritarianism is a form of government characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting.

What is the difference between an authoritarian regime and an electoral authoritarian regime quizlet?

With an authoritarian regime, political power for the citizens is very limited. Due to this, there is no constitutional accountability. In an electoral regime, elections occur but they are not truly democratic. Under regimes like this, elections are subject to manipulation by the state.

What are the main differences between authoritarian governments and democratic governments quizlet?

USA. What are the differences between authoritarian and democratic governments? Governments that control all aspects of citizens' economic, political, and social lives are called authoritarian. Governments that give people economic, social, and political freedoms are democratic.