What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

Recommended textbook solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

American Government

1st EditionGlen Krutz

412 solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition

16th EditionGeorge C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry

269 solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

Criminal Justice in America

9th EditionChristina Dejong, Christopher E. Smith, George F Cole

105 solutions

Recommended textbook solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

American Corrections

11th EditionMichael D. Reisig, Todd R. Clear

160 solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

American Government

1st EditionGlen Krutz

412 solutions

Upgrade to remove ads

Only SGD 41.99/year

  • Flashcards

  • Learn

  • Test

  • Match

  • Flashcards

  • Learn

  • Test

  • Match

Terms in this set (244)

party identification

The political party for which one or one's family usually votes ex. republican, democratic

political ideology

beliefs ex. liberal, conservative

political center

having beliefs that fall in the middle of the political spectrum, not solely identifying with 1 of the major political parties. (the majority of Americans have this point of view) it moves over time

linkage institutions

channels or structures that allow individuals to communicate their preferences to policy-makers within the government. ex. political partties, elections, interest groups, and media

political party

an organized group of people with similar political goals and opinions who seek to control govt and influence policies by helping their candidates win elections at all levels of the government

interest groups v. political parties

political parties have broader goals

what kind of party sytstem do we have in the US?

2-party system. 2 parties dominate

Era of Good Feelings, 1815-24

in 1832, 1 dominant party exited- democratic republican and countries seemed very unified, but there were factions. 1857 back to normal

golden age of parties 1874

dominant parties in different cities

governmental party

office holders and candidates

organizational party

workers and activists

party-in-the-electorate

those who vote for a party/associate themselves with it

functions of a party

1. recruit and nominate quality candidates for political office
2. support their candidates through fundraising and media strategy
3. mobilize, energize, and inform voters about issues, parties often issue voter guides.
4. develop a party platform (formal statement of a political party's principles, objectives- gives guidance to members of what issues are important and positions on major issues)
5. party influences organization of govt. (committee + leadership in legislative relations between branches, appointment process, etc.)

the evolving role of parties and political machines (late 1800s-1940s)

a political party organization that is organized efficient but also corrupt (run by political boss) uses inducements and bribes to win votes. parties have become weaker as institutions over time (starting around 1940) progressive era reforms (reducing patronage, growth of primaries, more mobile population ., national state and local laws regulating party behavior. rise of more candidate centered politics (weaker party identification among voters.

splitting vote

often creates divided government. some split vote b/w parties occasionally voting for a 3rd party/ independent parties. for example. a voter might vote for a republican presidential candidate but vote for a democrat congress and ligertariam for governor. split ticket voting is currently on the decline. more polarization into 2 diff parties

realignment

a significant and lasting shift of party affiliation amonst certain groups of voters from one party to another. often amongst certain groups of voters from one party to another. chanve cam occur nationally or within certain regions. change cam also occur within certain demographic groups.

example of realignment

older coters replaced w younger voters formerly solid southern democrat states have become republican. NE shifted from republican to democrat electorate

dealignment

general decline in party identification among electorate. increased over part several decades, at least 1/3 of the population doesn't identity with a political party (independent) parties have weakened in recent decades, but still have significant influence on American political system and maintain their group on power.

party outreach strategy

parties want to identify their followers and target them with strategic messaging and ailorea to their political party interests. communication technology and coter data management assist in this.

impact of enhanced communication technology

communication technology data management systems have increased the potential for insurgent candidates to succeed even without support from national party (more candidate-centered politics)

national convention

one of the main events organized by the national party committee is the party's national convention held once every 4 years. each party officially nominated its candidates for president and vice president and develops a party platform.

political party structure

both major parties are represented by national committee (ONC, RNC) but many parties are largely decentralized w/ committees in each state and in many counties across the US

RNC and DNC

Republican and Democratic National Committee

third parties

in the US, a third party is best defined as any party other than the 2 parties. third parties may compete in elections but rarely win at any level. ex. Green party, socialist, libertarian, etc.

third parties have a difficulty accesing the ballot

democrats and republicas automatically on ballot while third parties have to get signnatures and jump through other hoops to get on the ballot

third parties have a lack of funding

third parties have difficulty raising money many potential donors feel like their money will go to waste as third party rarely wins. also do not qualify for public funding for presidential campaign if their did not receive at least 5% of vote in the previous election.

third parties have a hard time getting chose because of the structure of the US elections

most elections in the US are first past the post or winner takes all, so only the #1 vote getter wins. Also for the hosue of Reps, the country is divided into single-member districts and eacg district only elects one member ( candidate recieving the most votes)

lack of appeal makes it hard for third parties to win.

third parties may hold more extreme views that do not appeak to most ammericans (ex. communist party)

lack of votes is another obstacle for third party candidares

some americans support the ideals of a third party but they feel like they are wasting their vote if theu cast their ballot for a 3rd party reforms like ran-choice voting (RCV) could alleviare this problem and allow cotess to pick their actual first choice without their vote having to be wated

lack of media coverage is an obstacle for 3rd party candidates.

third party candidates get little media attention and are not invited to telecised debates unless polling is 15% or better

qthird parties can cange outcome

third parties can play a role of "spoiler" (whether intentionally or not) by gathering enough votes in a close election to change the outcome (ex. Ralph NAder in 2000)

third parties can introduce new policies and ideas

third parties may address ideas or policies that two main parties are ignoring (balanced budget---ross Perot in 1993 and 1996 women's right to vote--socialist and progressive parties in 1900s 40-hour work week---populist and socialist )

third parties increased voter choice check power of main parties

third parties give voters more choices which can enhance democracy, allows voters to reflect discontent with Republicans and Democratic major parties and often forced to address issues brought up by third parties that are popular with the voter.s .

what is an interest group?

an organization made up of people who share common objectives and who actively attempt to influence government policymakers through direct and indirect methods. they have similar policy cols and they try to influence the political process to achieve those goals.

what do interest groups do?

to try and influence public polict, lobbyists try to persuade public officials to support or oppoese a specidic view poiint or policy.

how can interest groups influence election outcomes?

typically through PACs and super PACs.

which levels of government are affected by interest groups?

all

who are lobbysists usually

former congress people or people who are somehow connected to congress

what SHOULD interest groups do?

promote interest in public affairs, provide useful information, serve as watchdogs, and represent interest of citizrns

what are linkage institutions?

parties, elections, interest groups, and the media. they help link or connect citizens to their government and helps give citizens a way to participate that makes their voices heard as well as learn more about their govt and its leaders.

interest groups have been criticized for

ignoring the wider interest of society, producting confusion and deadlocj in congress, generating so much emotion that they make reasoned discussio =n difficult, and hacing too much influence.

political parties v interest gorups.

political parties nominate candidates, want to win elections, and are concerned with many issues whereas interest groups don't nominate, want to influence policies, and are comcered with once issue but they still have preference on who gets elected and puts money into this person.

what is a lobbyist?

someone whose task it is to influence legislation or policymaking. generalky works for an interest group

who hires lobbyists?

businesses, trade associations, colleges, or universities, foreign countries, local and state government units, or anyone else wanting their voice heard on policy matters.

what lobbyists should do

a lobbyist must be honest and truthful if he or she wants to remain effective. access to lawmakers is critical and if a lobbyist gets a reputation of being untruthful or disingenuous, legislation doors will close. good lobbyists will also make lawmakers aware of the downsides of a bill and arguments on the other side as well.

what gives lobbyists power?

access to lawmakers. which is why they are usually former congressmen or active pac contributors

why do people join interest groups?

solidary incentives, material incentives, purposive incentives

what are solidary incentives?

social contacts between groups with similar interests, experiences. league of women voters, NAACP, PTSA, American Legion

what are material incentives?

most common type, for economic reasons. AARP, Farmers group, Labor Unions

what are purposive incentives?

for moral causes/crusades., right to to life, pro-choice, greenpeace

who joins interest groups?

wealty and educated upper class - big business. more affluent join and are more active, white collar workers, professional grouos, working class - big labor, labor unions have been very powerful in oast but the AFL-CIO broke up in 2004 cutting big labors power

AARP

american association of retired persons. benefits for retired people- important voting block. supports both middle age republicans and very old democrats. votes in all kinds of elections.

AFL-CIO

workplace issues and benefits for workers. labor union/ blue collar workers. usually votes democrat

white collar

a description characterizing lower-level professional and management workers and some highly skilled laborers in technical jobs

blue collar

member of the working class who performs manual labor and earns an hourly wage

american bar association

concerned with legal issues such as caps on awards to victimes, malpractice. lawyersm usually leans democratic

ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

concerned with the bull of rights and cilvil liberties. can be both but more associated with democrat/libertarian

AMAp American Med. Association

medical issues, stem cell research, malpractice. doctors, usually republican

christian coalition

religious issues, pro-life. an important voting block. republican

league of women voters

voting issues, debates. both but many are democrats.

NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People)

concerned with issues for voting and ither civil rights issues are an important voting block. african americans, democrats

NEA (National Education Association)

education issues, protect teacher jobs, generally against NCLB or want them to reform NCLB. teachers. high % usually vote democrat

NOW (National Organization for Women)

women's issues- pro choice. women, democrats

NRA (National Rifle Association)

pro-guns a/ 2nd amendment issues, less restrictive gun laws + gun control. republicans + libertarians

National Right to Life Committee

pro-life/anti-abortion. republicans

sierra club

environmental issues mostly democrat.

veternans of foreign war/american legion

veterans concernmed w issued about benefits. both but generally republican.

facts about the AARP

among those over 50, AARP members are more likely to vote than nonmenbers,

economic interest groups

most interest groups are based on economics
- business, agriculture, labor, professional

why are businesses economic interest gorup

create favorable environment for business to prosper

why is agriculture economic

work for price supports from govt but also limit govt influence

why is labor economic

call public attention to the legitimate needs of working people. accomplishments either hour working dat..child labor laws...minimum wage laws...workplace health and safety laws..

why is professional economic

protect and advance their professional field --- to do this, they publish journals, give awards for excellence and communitcate their opinions to govt officials.

cause based

National Wildlife Federation, League of Women Voters, National Rifle Association, MADD, Emily's List

concerned with the welfare of people

AARP, NAACP

religious organization

christian coalition, american jewish congress

interrst group direct techniques

lobby at capitol hill, have private meetings, meet at social occasions, testify at hearings, drafting legislations, providing political info, supply nomination suggestions

interest groups indirects techniques

generating public pressure, use public pressure on hot button issues, use constituents to call lawmakers, build an alliance with other hroups

what makes an interest group successful?

leaders, patrons and funding, and members

succesful leaders

having a prominent leader aids in the rep. of the group and enhances the group's ability to attain its goals.

patrons and funding

funding is critical. without money, it is hard to get your message out

members

a group must have mebers to be successful. organizing members allows for strength in numbers and pooling of financial support.

where does the $$ come from?

member dues, federal grants, direct mail appeals for cash, internet sites, dinners and fundraisers, PACs

political action committee

committee formed by a special-interest group to raise money for their favorite political candidates. most PACs represent business, labor, or ideological interests

what are PACs known as?

political arms of interest groip. they are used to elect or defeat govt officials and promote legisltation

the revolving door

PACs hire former members of congress to lobby their cold frilds, committees, etc.

PAC rules

a PAC must register six moths in advance, have atleast 50 contributors, and give to at least 5 candidates.

who may establish PACS?

corporations, unions, and other associations

how much money may PACs recieve from any individual PAC or party commitee?

up to $5000, they can also give up to 15,000 annually to any national party committee and 5000 annually to any other pac.

who do PACs support?

candidates with campaign money. 1/2 sponsored by corporations; 1/10 by union. 1/3 liberal and 2/3 conservative.

Who gets the most PAC money?

incumbents

money limits

individuals can give up to $2,700 to a candidate but PACs can give $5,000 to a candidate. federal money will match presidential campaign money but parties need at least 5% vote in the precious year for presidential candidate to receive funds. if that doesn't happen, you need OACs.

important PACs

the laborers international union of north america, the national association of realtors, the national rifle association, microsoft corp, exxon mobil, emily's list (early money is like yeast, it makes the dough rise) human rights campains

where does all the $$ go?

if you give you shall recieve, benefits are higher than contribution, more contribution = more benefits.

Super PACS

super PACs are a new kinf of political action commitee created in July 2010 following the outcome of federal court case speechnow.org c federal action commission (after citizens united case) technically known as inipendent expenditure-only commitees.

how much may super PACs raise?

unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions, associations and individuals. they spend ulimited sums to overtly advocate for or against political candidates.

what makes super pacs different?

they are prohibited from donating money directly to the political candidate, they must howeverr report their donors to the federal election commsion on a monthly casis- the super PACs choice- as a traditional pac would,

what kind of ads to super pacs fund?

very negative ones.

1946 Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act

Have to apply as a lobbyist and report salary, expenses, meetings, who you meet with, etc.

1978 Ethics in Government Act

Officials must disclose finances and employment after leaving government service

1995 Lobbying Disclosure Act

- Must Register and Report clients
- Estimate how much they are paid and report the % to the government
- This law was strengthened by the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007

Jack Abramoff Scandal

- "Super-Lobbyist" Abramoff plead guilty to corruption charges in 2006
- Abramoff pleaded guilty to defrauding the Native American tribes that were his clients, to tax evasion and to conspiring to bribe public officials
- He illegally gave gifts and made campaign donations to legislators in return for votes or support of legislation
- Several federal officials were also accused and found guilty in the scandal

1st amendment

congress shall make no law abdridging the freedom of speech or press. presses.reporters do not have to reveal sources. sources are protected. however, recently some been jailed for reusing.

media scorekeeper

Keeps track of who is winning and losing, also candidates and their history and approval ratings

Media Watchdog

exposing scandals

media gatekeeper

passing judgements on topics that then become national issues. agenda setting and issue framing

agenda setting

the power of the media to bring public attention to particular issues and problems

issue framing

the power of the media to influence how events and issues are interpreted

1690s-1830s Partisan Party Press

small circulating expenisive to buy, elites only govt.

1840s Penny/Popular Press Partisan views

high spreed party/pressless cost mass circulation - needs sensational storiesto sell. subsidized president

lzte 1800s early 1900s

sensationalism reaches high point. yellow jounrlaism sensationalist unethincal/unprofessional practices by news media organizations or individual journalists. centered in competition between 2 media giants Joseph Pulitzer and William Pancoian. Today's Press still uses some of these techniques: if it bleeds it leads

yellow journalsim

spanish american war 1st tabloid top z late 19th century. Newspapers stirred up AMerican public. Remember Maine, to hell with SPain

1890s-1920s

exposure to curruption by press muckracker isusues like political corruption, corporate crime, child labor, conditions in slums and prisons, unsanitary conditions in food processing plants, fraudulent claims by manufacturersof patent medicines, labor racketeering, and similar topics most usually associated with progressive era 1890s-1920s

muckracker

investigative reporter who exposes corruption

upton sinclair

famous muckracker who exposed meat packing in novel, the jungle

radio news

1920s and 1830s FDR fireside speech

television

1950s to today. Nixon/Kennedy debates live for voters vietnam on TV is first time immediate coverage- election retyrns, challenger explosion, 9-11

internet

1990s to today major news outlets and blogsm unreliable sites. SOcial media platforms have been increasomgly utilized by politicians to reach supporters or potential voters

since 9-11

people watch national news more often. more vieweers more likely to have diff viewpoints. thus, bias claims have grown, HAs news chanhed or just viewers? prob a bit of both

print media

newspapers, journals, magazines, wire services

broadcast media

traditional radio and TV stations, Nerwrks and affiliates, cable satellite- CNN, Fox newsm

new media

internet and blogs

government regulations

regulates electronic media (Federal communications commission) 1996- telecommuntications act deregulated whole segments of electronic media. tried to bakance corporate profits with consumer needs, Results: Huge conglomerates like Viacom and Time Warner bought huge segments of mefia.

2003

FCC added reforms that allowed media outlets to own more than 1 type in merket (year channel has 6 radio stations in atl)

telecommunications act

1996 law overhauling federal regulation. Ended most limits on chain ownership

Communications Decency Act

failed 1996 and 1999 laws to keep indecent content off the internet. tried to address fears that internet pornography was on the rase. landmark 1997 decision supreme court ruled internet unique medium entitlet to highest protection under free speech . protections- blocked in high federal courts saying it was too broad CDA prohiboted posting indecent or potentially offensice materials in public forumonline discussion list. would have included texts of classic fictionsuch as catcher in the rye and ulysses gave internet fame free speech protection as media

government regulations on media

regulates electronic media (FCA federall comunications commision) broadcast televiseon and radio - licenses and regulated fcc rules "1 dirty words, janet jackson..fines are applied cable has little or no regulations

fairness doctrine

abolished radio and TV broadcasters to air contrasting views on major controversial public issue. but some still follow.

equal time rule

requires = air time for all major candidates competing for political office air time is NOT free, candidates must pay

political editiorializing rules

abolished in 2000. statooms that endorse candidates for office required to give candidate opponents dree rebuttal time.

rigjt of reply rule

broadcasting stations obliged to offer reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views wordingimportant; reasonable opportunity rather than equal - coverage not measured with a stopwatch. simply all sides of debate get heard

print media

newspapers and magazinesnno prior restraint government prohibitionof speech in advamce of publication. 1 fundemental right guaranteed by 1st amendment is freedom from prior reestraintin other words, more freedom and less rules than broadcast mediacan be sued for libel after publication of controversial articles you can only sue after.

can a story go to far?

libel is it true or false?is it misinterpreted on purpose? obscenity in media- playboy, penthouse, hustler. does it have social value? Hustler Inc v. fairwell does it incite evidence? schneck c FCC v. fox stationsfox broadcasted billboard and used explicative in acceptance allowed fine to stand

libel

written defamation

media coverage of congress

senate-broadcasts since 1950. house no cameras until 1978. today its 2417 CSPAN

media coverage of president

- FDR master of media
--> Fireside chats
--> Protected him from prying cameras
--> State of Union not a story until FDR
- Large press corps today
--> Daily press updates by press secretary
--> On campaign trail with candidates

bully pulpit

term stems from T roosevelt's refrence to write house as bully pulput meaning terrific platform from which to persuasively advocate an agenda. often used word bully as an adjective mening supreme/wonderful

are stories slanted?

routine news stories - least biasied since all station, papers will cover. feature stories have more bias, journalists pick and choose something exciting to cover, scandal sells

looking for bias in the media

bias: word that identifues collecting influence of entire context of a ,messafe. human communication always takes place in a context/medium...hard to stay objective

government contstrainsts

should government place constraints on journalistsshould reporters struke more of a balance? express moe neutral views

1933

senger published a critical story about governmer and governor sued him and charged with seditious libel, established that it wasnt enough that someone wrote something bad about you,

New York Times v. Sullivan

NY times allowed for an advertisement taken by Adrican American ministers and LB sullivan filed libel actionand said ad had falses in ut. He loses clse bc for public officials, not only is it flse but also if it were intentional

New York Times v. US

The President argues that the publication of the Pentagon Papers is in violation of executive privilege. Result: The barring of the publication of these papers is in violation of the 1st A. Publication does not imperial the public. has to be a threat to national security . his case didnt reach enough burden and publication was not affected

political effects of the media. reinforcement

sopporting positons alrrady heald.

filtering

audiences values determine whether to agree or disagree with policy positions reported (the effects of political socialization)

Slective perception

the interpretation of messages so that they agree with already healf belieds

selective exposure

The process by which individuals screen out messages that do not conform to their own biases.

the media seems to have little effect on policy prefrences

a) they are onyl reporting what is already going on,
b) the new data contradicts what was previously thought about the media determining the outcome of election and reporters influencing events.
c) agenda ssetting what's important and whats not
d) issue framinf how issues are discussed effects the outcome (how media frames KKK) is it freedom or influence, can influence more whoa are less informed?

functions of elections

they serve to legitimize governments, fill public ofices, and allow people with differnent views/policy agendas to come to power. ensures government remains accountable to people and allows for political change.

elections allows us to avoid

riots, general strikes, coups d'etats

Coups d'etat

military takeovers of a government.

why dont american;s vote?

long an complex ballots (confusing to voters and people poorly informetd), disaffection (determined by money and special interest support- loss of trust in government), legal barrier- some not allowed to vote (photo ID rules 15th 19th 23rd 24th 26th amendments fixed this ither legal requirements (age, citizenship)6.Young people/minorities less likely to vote.
7.Political parties don't mobilize voters (distant national bureaucracies)
8.No easy universal voter registration.
Requires effort (cost) without any cost for nonvoting

political efficacy

extent to which people feel they have an impact or exert some influence on public affairs

internal efficacy

beliefs about one;s own competence to understanf and participate in politics (how much knowledge fo I . have about the government and its workings?)

external efficacy

beliefs about responsiveness of governmental authorities and institutions to citizen demans (does the government listen to the people and respond to their will)

voter registration

system adopted by states that requires voters to register in advance

moter voter act

requires states to permit people to register to vote when they apply for driver;s licese. millions added to electorate but election outcomes not affected.

efforts to lower costs voting

same day registration, easing of registration regulations (no pic id required in most states show many forms of id), exoanison of ballot access (absentee or mail balloting, early voting, other mechanistms)

same day registration

produces higher turnout atleas 30% of american adults change their home address every 2 years, must reregister.

Do fewer voters help Republicans or Democrats?

usually republicans increasing categories of voters can make difference in either party

who usually wins elections incumbents or challengers?

incumbents- 90% in house and 70% in senate

who does higher turnout help? incumbent or challenger?

generally helps challenger but incumbents usualy still win,

seven types of elections

caucys, primary, general, initiatives, referendums, recall elections, run-off elections

caucus

political party gathers to make political decisions and to select candidates. straw ballots or nonbinding elections may take place in caucus

iowa caucus

- Most important because it's 1st
- Garners disproportionate number of candidate visits and amount of media attention
- Better than expected showing on caucus night can boost candidacy

primary elections

select party nominees for general election (held in diff days in diff states) most states force vorers to vote in only 1 primary (dem or rep) run by parties for benefit of parties. In 1-party states, primary election is the only election that matters

new hampshire

most important primary. major testing grounf for candidates for rep and dem nominations, attracts most attention, candidates who do poorly usually have to drop out and little known, under funded candidates who do well suddendly become contenders. some candidates spend 8-12 months there before electipns

open primaries

can enter voting booth then decide on party primary in which you will vote

closed primaries

most reveal your party.be registered member of that party to vote.

blanker (or love) primaries

voters may choose from both parteies (they may choose dem for governor and rep for senate)

Primaries and Delegates

- Each party holds primary/caucus
- Political elite from e/party selected as pledged delegates
--> Delegates must vote as state voted on 1st ballot
- Both parties have unpledged delegates who not obligated to vote w/state delegates
- Democrats
--> Currently 4,049 total delegates to DNC, including 3,253 pledged delegates and 796 unpledged or superdelegates.
--> Total # of delegate votes needed to win nomination is 2,025.
- Republicans
--> Currently 2,380 total delegates to RNC, including 1,917 pledged delegates and 463 unpledged delegates.
--> Total # of delegate votes needed to win nomination is 1,191.

superdelegates

dont have to indicate candidate preference, compete for position. typically member sof national committee, elected officials like senators or governors, or party leaders.

general elections

off yeat, presidential, midterm

off-year elections (2011 2013 2015)

generally odd years, include mayoral races, school boards etc.

presidential election years (2000 2004 2008 2012)

party nominated candidates and independents. first tuesday after first monday in november.

midterm elections (2002 2006 2010)

general election but no presidential race. still first tues after first monday in november. both party-nominated candidates and independents but few voters.

general election turnout

voter turnout highest for general elections. in presidential years, general election turnot highestl=. in midterms, general election turnout decreases in most states

initiatives

allows citizens to propose legislation and submit it to popular vote. Popular in CA and western states

referendum

allows legislature to submit proposed legislation for popular approval. special elections on certain topics or issues state voters approve or disapprove on proposed legislations often used for constitutional amendments. I.E. GA legislature sponsored. "marriage amendment" passed w overwhelming support

marriage amendment

o=constitutional amendment 1 appeared on the ballot in GA as legislatively referred amendment

recall elections

allows citizens to remove someone from office. voters decide whether or not to vote out an offivial

runoff elections

Allow citizens to pick from top 2 vote candidates AFTER primary or general election

instant runoff/ transferrable vote sustem.

Allows ballot to be recounted if no candidate wins a majority

yellow dog democrat

staunch loyalist to dem. party. term first occured in 1928 elections, when al smith ran for president against herbert hoover. southerners hared hoover.

blue dog democrates

pFiscally conservative Democratic
Blue Dog Coalition formed in 1995
with goal of representing center of House
of Rep. and appealing to mainstream
values of public.
pDedicated to set of beliefs that transcend partisan politics, including commitment to financial stability/ national security of US
nTheir numbers in Congress have been declining - currently 15 members
(2009 - 54 members; 2011 - 26 members)

electoral college

framers wanted president chosen by the elite of the country, electoral college established. winner takes all system gives bigger emphasis to more populated states. except for NE and ME which use divided elevtor system. state parties choose electors

how the electoral college works

-each state parties select electors, they use as reward for a faithful service to the party. each state has a winner take all system.
-electors meet in their states in dec and mail votes to the vp. vote is counted when new congressional session opens in jan.
-if no candidate wins--house of rep chooses from top 3 electoral winners.

hoe many electoral votes does each state recieve.

Electoral votes are determined by the number of representatives in Congress from that state (members of House plus Senators (always 2); Georgia in 2012: 14 Reps in House + 2 Senators = 16 electoral votes). Washington, D.C. gets 3 electoral votes.

How many electoral votes does a candidate need to win?

270 electoral votes (which represents the bare minimum majority out of the 538 votes up for grabs). The winner of the popular vote in a state wins ALL of the electoral votes for that state ("winner-take-all" system). The only exceptions...Maine and Nebraska.

What happens if no single candidate receives at least 270 electoral votes (the minimum majority)?

If no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes, the House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each State delegation has one vote. (The Senate would elect the Vice President.) This has happened twice...in 1800 and 1824.

low population

more wi]eight of persons vote

. So does the popular vote even matter?

YES. Even though 4 Presidents have been elected despite LOSING the national popular vote, it is not accurate to say the popular vote is meaningless. So where does popular vote really matter?? WITHIN EACH STATE!!

Should We Change the Current Electoral System?

Use Popular Vote Instead of E. College
Alter Current System
pDivide electoral votes within states
pUse popular vote as secondary check
Alternative Voting Systems
pPlurality voting system
pHare System (Similar to Transferable Vote System but with different rounds)
pThe Borda Count
pSequential Pair-Wise Voting

plurality voting

each person casts one vote for a choice and the option with the otion with the most votes wins.

hare system

this method involves taking an initial poll in which each person casts one vote for his or her favorite option. the option recieving the least number of first place votes is eleinated and then another poll is taken. those who originally voted for the . eliminated option vote their second choice, continually eliminate the least pop. option until a single wnner emerges,

the borda count.

pThis is a voting method that takes into account each voter's first, second, and third choices.
pEach first-choice vote is awarded two points, each second choice vote is awarded one point, and no point is awarded for a third choice. This way, each choice is assigned a point-value.
pExample: For Al Gore has seventeen first-choice votes and five second-choice votes, for a total of 2(17) + 1(5) = 39 points.

ssequntial pair-wise voting

pThis method involves a sequence of head-to-head contests.
pFirst, the group votes on any one of two of the options and then the preferred option is matched with the next option, while the 'loser' is eliminated. Continue eliminating the less popular option of a pairing, until one remains.

From George Washington's Farewell Address

pWarned about dangers of political parties
p"...the spirit of Party are sufficient to make it the interest and the duty of a wise People to discourage and restrain it."

5 instances where winner of popular vote didn't get presidency:

p1824: House selects John Quincy Adams (loser: Andrew Jackson)
p1876: Samuel Tilden wins popular vote, Rutherford Hayes wins presidency.
p 1888: Benjamin Harrison edged in popular vote by Grover Cleveland, but Harrison wins in electoral college.
p 2000: Gore wins popular vote, Bush takes presidency after US Supreme Court decides Florida dispute.
p2016: Hillary Clinton won the national popular vote but Donald Trump won the electoral vote.

Party Realignment/Critical Elections

pOccurs when new voting coalition appears in election year
nOften after long period of little party change
pCritical or realigning elections
n1800 (Democratic-Republicans)
n1828 (Jacksonian Democrats)
n1860 (Republicans- abolitionists)
n1896 (Democrats-Populists and farmers; Republicans-City and business interests)
n1932 (New Deal Coalition Democrats)

election if 1800

thomas jefferson (RD) Jeffersonians- states' rights, john adams (F)

election of 1828

Andrew jackson (D) common mn=an voters no land requirements John Quincy adams (F)

election of 1860

abraham lincoln (R) anti-slavery, Stephen douglas (No. Democray) John C Breckenridge (D) Bell (Constitutional Unionist

1896

william mcKinlet (R) pro business aand city dwellers
william jennings Bryan (D)

1932

pFranklin Delano Roosevelt (D)
nThe powerful New Deal Coalition was born
pLabor Unions, farmers, Populists, African-Americans, Southern whites, and socially-conscious individuals
pMuch of this coalition still votes for Democrats today
pHerbert Hoover (R)

1960

John F kennedy (D)(television dabares) v richard nixon (R)

1968

pRichard Nixon (R)
nSilent majority
nSouthern strategy
pHumphrey (D)- 1968
nDemocrats are splintered after violence at 1968 Chicago Convention
pWallace (I)-1968
nTakes away votes in South from Dems

1972

p1972
nNixon (R)
p"Nixon Now"!
nGeorge McGovern (D) 1972
pUnpopular with political and party elite
pSelected as nominee at DNC because no one else was front runner and he had grassroots support from primaries

1980

pRonald Reagan (R)
n"Anyone but Carter" mindset
nConservative strategy will fix economy
nChristian Coalition and Moral Majority joined forces to elect Republicans (Pro-life)
pJimmy Carter (D)
nIranian Hostage crisis and sinking economy hurt Carter's chance for reelection

1984

Ronald Raegan (r) walter Mondale (d)

1992

Bill clinton (D)
p"It's the economy, stupid"
nUsed Bush's promise of "Read my lips, no new taxes" brilliantly (James Carville)
nPerot took away some of the votes that would have gone to Bush
pGeorge HW Bush (R)
nOut of touch with Americans
pRoss Perot (Reform)
19% of popular vote- WOW!!

Election of 1994**

pMidterm election
pUshered in the "Conservative Revolution" headed by Newt Gingrich
pAKA...the "Devolution Revolution"
pGingrich and his fellow Conservative Republicans offered Americans a "Contract with America"

election of 2000

pGeorge W. Bush (R)
nSqueaker election
pFlorida was swing state
nThrown in to Supreme Ct.
pVP AL Gore v Governor Jeb Bush
pAl Gore (D)
nIf had he won his own home state of TN he would have not needed FL!
pRalph Nader (Green)
nGreen's took away some of the natural base of Democrats

Election of 2006**

pMidterm election
pBrought Democrats back to power in both Houses of Congress for 1st time in over 10 years
pWar in Iraq was factor
pPresident Bush's unpopularity was also a factor

2008

pBarack Obama (Dem)
nMessage of change resonated with voters
nYoung people!
pJohn McCain (Rep)
nToo old??
nNot conservative enough for right wing Republicans and not liberal enough for Dems to cross over
http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html

reapportionment

seats in house reallocated after each census. states then redistrict sears according to pop growth within state. done by lrgislatures

supreme court rules for redistricting and gerrymandering

pCongressional districts must be apportioned on basis of pop.
pCongressional districts must be contiguous (no broken lines)
pUsing gerrymandering to dilute minority strength illegal under 1965 Voting Rights Act
pRedrawing boundaries SOLELY based on race unconstitutional according Shaw v Reno

Baker v Carr 1961

charles w baker and oteher tenessee citizens alleged that 1901 law designmed to apportion seats for state's general assembly was ignored bakers suit detailed how tennessee reaportionment efforts ignored economic growth and pop shifts within state, courth said yes, supreme court had jurisdicrion over questions of legilative apportionment.pJustice Brennan provided past examples where Court intervened to correct constitutional violations in matters pertaining to state administration and officers through whom state affairs are conducted.
pBrennan concluded that 14th Amendment equal protection issues which Baker and others raised in this case merited judicial evaluation.

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

pCase concerned reapportionment and civil rights
pNC created congressional district which was no wider than interstate road along which it stretched in order to create black-majority district
nAKA "Majority-minority district"
p5 NC residents challenged constitutionality of unusually shaped district, alleging its only purpose was to secure election of additional black representatives.
Was this gerrymandering case constitutional? ruling saud No district cannot be based on race alone

federal election campaidn act of 1971 (feca)

broad comprenhensive change in election law
-defined elections to include caucuses and conventions and general and special elections'
defined expenditures and contributions
- prohiboted promises of patronage
-prhibited contracts between candidare and any federal department or agency
- exempted from regulation contributions and expenditures for non-partison or non candidare based get out the vote and voter registration drives by unions and corporations.

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA) Continued...

6. exempted from regulation contributions and expenditures for voluntary fundraising and administration by unions and corporations
7. established caps on the amount of individuals could contribute to own campaign: presidential and vice presidential candidartes 6.$35,000 each; and House candidates, $25,000 each.
7.Established caps on TV ads at 10 cents per voter in last election or $50,000, whichever was higher.
8.Established disclosure guidelines for contributions of $100 or higher.
9.Expenditure and contribution reports made due by March 10 of each year.

amendments to FECA

pAfter Watergate, distrust of public officials was at peak.
nReformers in Congress pushed for campaign finance reform.
p1974 Amendments to FECA passed quickly, signed by Ford.
pLegitimated Political Action Committees, changed contribution limits, and established Federal Election Commission (FEC).

public funding for presidential races

defined major party as 1 recieved at least 25% vote in last federal election. set up system where private gists to presidential candidate would be matched by funds raised through long act.

disclosure and enforcement

nTreated loans as contributions.
nFines for not reporting could be as high as $50,000.
nViolators could be prevented from running for federal office for the length of the term of the office sought, plus one year.
nGave FEC power of advisory opinions.
nRequired full reports of contributions and expenditures to be filed 10 days before and 30 days after each election.
nRequired candidates to set up 1 campaign banking headquarters for easy research and accountability.

creation of FEC

p1975: Congress created Federal Election Commission (FEC) to administer/enforce FECA - statute that governs financing of federal elections.
pDuties of FEC:
nDisclose campaign finance info, enforce law (limits/prohibitions on contributions), oversee public funding of Pres. elections.

Buckley v. Valeo (1976)

pFacts
nIssue of campaign contributions came under scrutiny after Watergate
nFEC set guidelines and limits on money given to campaigns
pWas this constitutional??
nCourt had to decide whether or not you can be limited by amount you can spend on your OWN personal campaign
pWas this constitutional?? pYes!
pCase upheld limits on campaign spending set by FEC
nIt is now $2700 per election per candidate (for the 2015-16 election cycle)
pNo!
pSpending own money on campaign was found to be free speech right.
nMitt Romney, Ross Perot, and other wealthy Americans have taken advantage of personal wealth in quest for office.

hard money

pGiven directly to candidates: Limited by law
pIndividual Limits
n(FEC) limits individuals to contributions of $2,700 per election, per candidate
pCould contribute $2,700 in primary and another $2,700 in general election
p$33,400 to party committees
p$10,000 to state, district, and local party
p$115,000 TOTAL every 2 years (aggregate limits now unconstitutional - McCutcheon v. FEC)

soft money

pContributed to political parties with no limits or rules
pContributed to campaigns but NOT directly from donor
pBanned by BCRA due to abuses by parties
pSoft money raised and spent outside of federal election guidelines before BCRA.

bipartisan campaifn reform act

pPassed in 2002
nAKA McCain-Feingold Act
pBanned national political party committees from accepting/ spending soft money contributions
nOriginal intent lost in loopholes
nOther parts declared unconstitutional by Supreme Ct. in Citizens United v FEC

527's

groups that developed from loopholes in McCain-Feingold act. many run by special interest groups, used to raise unlimited amounts of $ to spend on issue advocacy or voter mobilixation. dont give money to any particular campaign/candidate not regulated by FEC

The 527 Loophole

pForm of soft money used to pay for 527 ads that don't expressly advocate election/defeat of particular candidate.
pCan't use words "vote for", "elect", "vote against"... these ads can't be paid for with unregulated soft money.
nMany argue that huge infusion of unregulated soft money has "destroyed the federal campaign laws".

'Swiftboating"

May 5, 2004: RNC accused MoveOn.org and others 527's of coordinating efforts with Kerry campaign
nhttp://www.moveon.org/
pAug. 20, 2004: Kerry campaign accused "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" of coordinating efforts with Bush campaign
phttp://www.livingroomcandidate.org/commercials/2004/any-questions/

Citizens United v FEC (2010)

citizens united sought injunction against FEC to prevent application of BCRA to film hillary"the movie. nMovie expressed opinions about whether Senator Hilary Rodham Clinton would make good president.
pIn attempt to regulate "big money" campaign contributions, BCRA applied variety of restrictions to "electioneering communications."
nBCRA (McCain-Feingold Act) prevents corporations/labor unions from funding such communication from general funds and require disclosure of donors disclaimer when communication not authorized by candidate it intends to support.
pCitizens United argued its 1st Amendment rights were violated.

importandce of citizens united v. FEC

pRules Left in Place
nCourt further held that BCRA's disclosure requirements as applied to The Movie were constitutional.
nHeld that political speech may be banned based on speaker's corporate identity.
nReasoned revealing identity of ad's sponsor justified by "governmental interest" in providing "electorate with information" about election-related spending resources.
pRules that were Changed
nGovernment may not limit corporate independent expenditures.
n1st Amendment doesn't allow government to impose restrictions on certain corporations/labor unions.
pPolitical speech "indispensable" to democracy, which is no less true because speech comes from corporation.

direct primary

A primary where voters directly select the candidates who will run for office

Initiative

A procedure by which voters can propose a law or a constitutional amendment.

critical election

An election when significant groups of voters change their traditional patterns of party loyalty.

wedge issues

a controversial issue that one party uses to split the voters in the other party

purple electorate

where popular support for the Republican Party (red) and Democratic Party (blue) is approximately equal; such states, in elections for the President of the United States, are termed "swing states" and are highly targeted on account of the Electoral College system of electing ...

prospective voting model

model of voting in which citizens select candidates based on what they promise to accomplish once in office

retrospective voting

voting for a candidate because you like his or her past actions in office

direct v indirect primary

form of closed primary
Adirect primary, which is now used in some form in all U.S. states, functions as a preliminary election whereby voters decide their party's candidates. In an indirectprimary, voters elect delegates who choose the party's candidates at a nominating convention.

valence issue

concerns or policies that are viewed in the same way by people with a variety of ideologies. In other words, issues that are uniformly considered desirable or undesirable by most in the electorate. Politicians may be debating minor details but the major thrust for what is being advocated is the same. For example, corruption is a valence issue because the major ideologies see corruption as undesirable. Of recent, there may be changes in how the parties define or understand corruption but the concept of corruption is typically considered undesirable.

Saliency

speaks to the degree or level of importance accorded to an issue. The more divisive issues tend to hold a higher saliency. For example, questions about reform of the Social Security hold high saliency for senior citizens just as the lack of job opportunities or college loans may have high saliency for people eighteen to twenty years of age since the unemployment rate is higher among younger people than that of older age groups.

Sets with similar terms

Politics and Elections

107 terms

Sandy_Vingoe

Voting & American Politics

42 terms

quizmaddietime

AP Government Unit 3 terms

81 terms

Naiset_Perez

Unit 2

240 terms

drew_wilson6

Other sets by this creator

preguntas problemáticas 2

29 terms

nividileepPLUS

Archetypes 2

37 terms

nividileepPLUS

Archetypes Quiz 1

18 terms

nividileepPLUS

hamlet

29 terms

nividileepPLUS

Recommended textbook solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

Street Law: A Course in Practical Law

9th EditionMcGraw-Hill Education

808 solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

Magruder's American Government

1st EditionSavvas Learning Co

555 solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

United States Government: Our Democracy

1st EditionDonald A. Ritchie, Richard C. Remy

1,148 solutions

What does it mean when the text suggests that parties are linkage institutions quizlet?

United States Government: Principles in Practice

1st EditionLuis Ricardo Fraga

825 solutions

Other Quizlet sets

Government Sands

42 terms

mason_brown4

Political Parties Study Guide

13 terms

Cnavarro_95

Political Science Test #4

57 terms

adalynnfarr

Party representation

12 terms

zoe_hamlyn

Related questions

QUESTION

Why not just a one party system?

3 answers

QUESTION

What separates proto-parties from third parties?

15 answers

QUESTION

Why is a campaign brochure NOT the best source of information about a candidate?

2 answers

QUESTION

How does political socialization explain where public opinion comes from?

5 answers

What are linkage institutions quizlet?

A linkage institution is a structure within a society that connects the people to the government or centralized authority. These institutions include: elections, political parties, interest groups, and the media.

How are political parties linkage institutions quizlet?

Political parties sever as linkage institutions by picking the candidates, running the candidates, giving cues to voters, articulating policies, and by coordinating policymaking.

Why are political parties linkage institutions?

Linkage institutions provide the means to connect those individuals within a society to the centralized authority. Political exclusions and oligarchical tendencies within societies create "linkage failures". These events create contentions within society and act as motivators towards social protests and rebellion.

Which of the following is a linkage function of political parties quizlet?

One important function of political parties as a linkage institution is the nominating (running and recruiting) of candidates for elected offices. They also provide political choices to voters.