What type of Departmentalisation involves grouping employees based on their work duties?

Organizations divide tasks into separate departments so specialists in a particular task can work with other specialists in the same task, increasing efficiency and productivity. When a company uses functional departmentalization, marketing specialists, for example, work together in the same department. When a company uses product departmentalization, specialists in one product line work with other specialists in the same product line. Most small businesses use functional departmentalization unless they have multiple distinct product lines or services.

Functional Departmentalization

Functional departmentalization organizes employees based on function or skill set. Salespeople and marketers work together in the marketing department, employees involved in making the company's products work in the manufacturing department and employees involved in designing new products work in the research and development department. Specific departments vary from company to company but are always designed so employees work with others who share similar skills or functions.

This type of organizational structure works best in smaller organizations without too many distinct product lines, reports business education and consulting firm Management Square. For example, if your business manufactures and distributes two different types of golf ball, it wouldn't make much sense to divide those two products into separate departments.

Product Departmentalization

Product departmentalization organizes employees based on which product line or set of services they work with. Each product line has a department of its own, and each department has specialists in all of the functions needed to produce and sell that product, such as marketing, manufacturing, accounting and human resources.

The departments in this type of company operate autonomously from each other and are often better at responding to changing circumstances in a flexible way. For example, the salespeople can talk to the design and manufacturing specialists in their own department to address customer satisfaction issues rather than having to go outside the department.

Smaller businesses would use this type of structure only if they offer distinctly different products or services. For instance, if your company provides both copywriting and printing, it might make sense to operate these services as separate and autonomous departments.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Functional departmentalization has the advantage of efficiency, because all of the employees in each department are specialists in the same or closely related skills. It has the potential disadvantage of inflexibility, because any issues that involve more than one skill set require communication and cooperation between departments. This is less likely to be an issue for a smaller organization, because the different departments may be in frequent contact already.

Product departmentalization has the advantage of flexibility but the potential disadvantage that the departments may compete unintentionally. For example, because each product line operates as an autonomous department, the actions or strategies of one department may interfere with those of another department in the same company.

A Combined Approach

Matrix departmentalization combines the organizational structures of product and functional departmentalization by using parallel management structures, reports management consultancy McKinsey and Company. Employees are organized into functional departments based on skill sets but also work with project managers who oversee all employees involved with a particular product line.

This type of organizational structure is intended to combine the advantages of product and functional departmentalization, but it has the potential disadvantage that employees must report to two separate supervisors, who may give contradictory instructions. Smaller companies usually can remain flexible while using the functional departmentalization structure alone, because the relatively small number of products and employees facilitates easier communication between different functions.

  1. Last updated
  2. Save as PDF
  • Page ID74569
  • What are the traditional forms of organizational structure?

    The key functions that managers perform include planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. This module focuses specifically on the organizing function. Organizing involves coordinating and allocating a firm’s resources so that the firm can carry out its plans and achieve its goals. This organizing, or structuring, process is accomplished by:

    • Determining work activities and dividing up tasks (division of labor)
    • Grouping jobs and employees (departmentalization)
    • Assigning authority and responsibilities (delegation)

    The result of the organizing process is a formal structure within an organization. An organization is the order and design of relationships within a company or firm. It consists of two or more people working together with a common objective and clarity of purpose. Formal organizations also have well-defined lines of authority, channels for information flow, and means of control. Human, material, financial, and information resources are deliberately connected to form the business organization. Some connections are long-lasting, such as the links among people in the finance or marketing department. Others can be changed at almost any time—for example, when a committee is formed to study a problem.

    Every organization has some kind of underlying structure. Typically, organizations base their frameworks on traditional, contemporary, or team-based approaches. Traditional structures are more rigid and group employees by function, products, processes, customers, or regions. Contemporary and team-based structures are more flexible and assemble employees to respond quickly to dynamic business environments. Regardless of the structural framework a company chooses to implement, all managers must first consider what kind of work needs to be done within the firm.

    Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): Founded in 1943, Sweden retailer IKEA has grown from a small mail-order operation to a global force in home furnishings with more than 390 stores throughout Europe, North America, Africa, Australia, and Asia. Best known for its contemporary furniture designs, highly trafficked store openings, and quirky advertising, the IKEA Group consists of multiple divisions corresponding to the company’s retail, supply chain, sales, and design and manufacturing functions. What factors likely influenced the development of IKEA’s organizational structure as the company expanded over the years? (Credit: JJBers/ flickr/ Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0))

    Division of Labor

    The process of dividing work into separate jobs and assigning tasks to workers is called division of labor. In a fast-food restaurant, for example, some employees take or fill orders, others prepare food, a few clean and maintain equipment, and at least one supervises all the others. In an auto assembly plant, some workers install rearview mirrors, while others mount bumpers on bumper brackets. The degree to which the tasks are subdivided into smaller jobs is called specialization. Employees who work at highly specialized jobs, such as assembly-line workers, perform a limited number and variety of tasks. Employees who become specialists at one task, or a small number of tasks, develop greater skill in doing that particular job. This can lead to greater efficiency and consistency in production and other work activities. However, a high degree of specialization can also result in employees who are disinterested or bored due to the lack of variety and challenge.

    Traditional Structures

    After a company divides the work it needs to do into specific jobs, managers then group the jobs together so that similar or associated tasks and activities can be coordinated. This grouping of people, tasks, and resources into organizational units is called departmentalization. It facilitates the planning, leading, and control processes.

    An organization chart is a visual representation of the structured relationships among tasks and the people given the authority to do those tasks. In the organization chart in Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\), each figure represents a job, and each job includes several tasks. The sales manager, for instance, must hire salespeople, establish sales territories, motivate and train the salespeople, and control sales operations. The chart also indicates the general type of work done in each position. As Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\) shows, five basic types of departmentalization are commonly used in organizations:

    Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\): Organization Chart for a Typical Appliance Manufacturer Attribution: Copyright Rice University, OpenStax, under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license

    1. Functional departmentalization, which is based on the primary functions performed within an organizational unit (marketing, finance, production, sales, and so on). Ethan Allen Interiors, a vertically integrated home furnishings manufacturer, continues its successful departmentalization by function, including retail, manufacturing and sourcing, product design, logistics, and operations, which includes tight financial controls.1

    Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\): Exhibit 7.5 Five Traditional Ways to Organize (Attribution: Copyright Rice University, OpenStax, under CC BY 4.0 license.)

    1. Product departmentalization, which is based on the goods or services produced or sold by the organizational unit (such as outpatient/emergency services, pediatrics, cardiology, and orthopedics). For example, ITT is a diversified leading manufacturer of highly engineered components and customized technology solutions for the transportation, industrial, and oil and gas markets. The company is organized into four product divisions: Industrial Process (pumps, valves, and wastewater treatment equipment), Control Technologies (motion control and vibration isolation products), Motion Technologies (shock absorbers, brake pads, and friction materials), and Interconnect Solutions (connectors for a variety of markets).2
    2. Process departmentalization, which is based on the production process used by the organizational unit (such as lumber cutting and treatment, furniture finishing, and shipping). For example, the organization of Gazprom Neft, a Russian oil company, reflects the activities the company needs to perform to extract oil from the ground and turn it into a final product: exploration and research, production (drilling), refining, and marketing and distribution.3 Pixar, the animated-movie company now part of Disney, is divided into three parallel yet interactive process-based groups: technology development, which delivers computer-graphics tools; creative development, which creates stories and characters and animates them; and production, which coordinates the film-making process.4
    3. Customer departmentalization, which is based on the primary type of customer served by the organizational unit (such as wholesale or retail purchasers). The PNC Financial Services Group offers a wide range of services for all of its customers and is structured by the type of consumer it serves: retail banking for consumers; the asset management group, with specific focus on individuals as well as corporations, unions, municipalities, and others; and corporate and institutional banking for middle-market companies nationwide.5

    ETHICS IN PRACTICE

    Ethics in Practice

    Panera’s Menu Comes CleanMaking a strategic change to a company’s overall philosophy and the way it does business affects every part of the organizational structure. And when that change pertains to sustainability and “clean food,” Panera Bread Company took on the challenge more than a decade ago and now has a menu free of man-made preservatives, sweeteners, colors, and flavors.

    In 2015, Ron Shaich, company founder and CEO, announced Panera’s “no-no” list of nearly 100 ingredients, which he vowed would be eliminated or never used again in menu items. Two years later, the company announced that its menu was “100 percent clean,” but the process was not an easy one.

    Panera used thousands of labor hours to review the 450 ingredients used in menu items, eventually reformulating more than 120 of them to eliminate artificial ingredients. Once the team identified the ingredients that were not “clean,” they worked with the company’s 300 vendors—and in some instances, a vendor’s supplier—to reformulate an ingredient to make it preservative-free. For example, the recipe for the company’s popular broccoli cheddar soup had to be revised 60 times to remove artificial ingredients without losing the soup’s taste and texture. According to Shaich, the trial-and-error approach was about finding the right balance of milk, cream, and emulsifiers, like Dijon mustard, to replace sodium phosphate (a no-no item) while keeping the soup’s texture creamy. Panera also created a new cheddar cheese to use in the soup and used a Dijon mustard that contained unpreserved vinegar as a substitute for the banned sodium phosphate.

    Sara Burnett, Panera’s director of wellness and food policy, believes that the company’s responsibility goes beyond just serving its customers. She believes that Panera can make a difference by using its voice and purchasing power to have a positive impact on the overall food system. In addition, the company’s Herculean effort to remove artificial ingredients from its menu items also helped it take a close look at its supply chain and other processes that Panera could simplify by using better ingredients.

    Panera is not yet satisfied with its commitment to clean food. The food chain recently announced its goal of sourcing 100 percent cage-free eggs for all of its U.S. Panera bakery-cafés by 2020.

    Critical Thinking Questions

    1. How does Panera’s approach to clean eating provide the company with a competitive advantage?
    2. What kind of impact does this commitment to preservative-free food have on the company’s organizational structure?
    3. Does “clean food” put additional pressure on Panera and its vendors? Explain your reasoning.

    Sources: “Our Food Policy,” www.panerabread.com, accessed July 24, 2017; Emily Payne, “Panera Bread’s Sara Burnett on Shifting Demand for a Better Food System,” Food Tank, http://foodtank.com, accessed July 18, 2017; Julie Jargon, “What Panera Had to Change to Make Its Menu ‘Clean,’” The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com, February 20, 2017; John Kell, “Panera Says Its Food Menu Is Now 100% ‘Clean Eating,’” Fortune, http://fortune.com, January 13, 2017; Lani Furbank, “Seven Questions with Sara Burnett, Director of Wellness and Food Policy at Panera Bread,” Food Tank, https://foodtank.com, April 12, 2016.

    1. Geographic departmentalization, which is based on the geographic segmentation of organizational units (such as U.S. and Canadian marketing, European marketing, and Latin American marketing).

    People are assigned to a particular organizational unit because they perform similar or related tasks, or because they are jointly responsible for a product, client, or market. Decisions about how to departmentalize affect the way management assigns authority, distributes resources, rewards performance, and sets up lines of communication. Many large organizations use several types of departmentalization. For example, Procter & Gamble (P&G), the multibillion-dollar consumer-products company, integrates four different types of departmentalization, which the company refers to as “four pillars.” First, the Global Business Units (GBU) divide the company according to products (baby, feminine, and family care; beauty; fabric and home care; and health and grooming). Then, P&G uses a geographical approach, creating business units to market its products around the world. There are Selling and Market Operations (SMO) groups for North America; Latin America; Europe; Asia Pacific; Greater China; and India, the Middle East, and Africa. P&G’s third pillar is Global Business Services division (GBS), which also uses geographic departmentalization. GBS provides technology processes and standard data tools to enable the GBUs and SMOs to better understand the business and to serve consumers and customers better. It supports P&G business units in areas such as accounting and financial reporting, information technology, purchases, payroll and benefits administration, and facilities management. Finally, the divisions of the Corporate Functions pillar provide a safety net to all the other pillars. These divisions are comprised of functional specialties such as customer business development; external relations; human resources; legal, marketing, consumer, and market knowledge; research and development; and workplace services.6

    Line-and-Staff Organization

    The line organization is designed with direct, clear lines of authority and communication flowing from the top managers downward. Managers have direct control over all activities, including administrative duties. An organization chart for this type of structure would show that all positions in the firm are directly connected via an imaginary line extending from the highest position in the organization to the lowest (where production of goods and services takes place). This structure, with its simple design and broad managerial control, is often well-suited to small, entrepreneurial firms.

    As an organization grows and becomes more complex, the line organization can be enhanced by adding staff positions to the design. Staff positions provide specialized advisory and support services to line managers in the line-and-staff organization, shown in Figure \(\PageIndex{4}\). In daily operations, individuals in line positions are directly involved in the processes used to create goods and services. Individuals in staff positions provide the administrative and support services that line employees need to achieve the firm’s goals. Line positions in organizations are typically in areas such as production, marketing, and finance. Staff positions are found in areas such as legal counseling, managerial consulting, public relations, and human resource management.

    Figure \(\PageIndex{4}\): Line-and-Staff Organization (Attribution: Copyright Rice University, OpenStax, under CC BY 4.0 license.)

    CONCEPT CHECK

    1. How does specialization lead to greater efficiency and consistency in production?
    2. What are the five types of departmentalization?

    Which type of departmentalization is grouping jobs by functions performed?

    FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENTALIZATION It groups jobs according to function. Functional departmentalization defines departments by the functions each one performs such as accounting or purchasing. Every Organization must perform certain jobs in order to do its work.

    What is grouping departmentalization?

    Departmentalization is an organizational structure that separates people into groups, or departments, based on a particular set of criteria. These departments have their own leadership and work together to complete tasks. With large or complicated projects, multiple departments may work together.

    What are the 5 types of departmentalization?

    The primary forms of departmentalization are by function, process, product, market, customer, geographic area, and sometimes matrix (also called project organization).

    Which type of Departmentalisation group together the jobs which are involving the similar activities?

    Functional Departmentalization Functional departmentalization groups together jobs which are involving the same or similar activities. It allows the organization to staff all important positions with functional experts and facilitates coordination and integration.