Which type of subsequent events requires consideration by management and evaluation by the auditor?
Favorited Content Show
Publication date: 29 Nov 2021 us Financial statement presentation guide 28.4 As discussed in ASC 855-10-20, there are two types of subsequent events: Excerpt of definition from ASC 855-10-20
Recognized subsequent events (see FSP 28.5) are pushed backed and recorded in the financial statements to be issued. Examples include the realization of a loss on the sale of inventory or property held for sale when the subsequent act of sale confirms a previously existing unrecognized loss. See FSP 28.5 for other examples. Nonrecognized subsequent events (see FSP 28.6) are considered for disclosure based on their nature to keep the financial statements from being misleading. An example is a natural disaster that destroys a facility after the balance sheet date. See FSP 28.6.3 and 855-10-55-2 for other examples. PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the US member firm or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors.
Please ensure Back to the Original document This view is read only. To access this content, click on "Go to content" What is a Subsequent Event?A subsequent event is an event that occurs after a reporting period, but before the financial statements for that period have been issued or are available to be issued. Depending on the situation, such events may or may not require disclosure in an organization's financial statements. The two types of subsequent events are noted below. Additional InformationAn event provides additional information about conditions in existence as of the balance sheet date, including estimates used to prepare the financial statements for that period. New EventsAn event provides new information about conditions that did not exist as of the balance sheet date. Subsequent Event ReportingGenerally accepted accounting principles state that the financial statements should include the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional information about conditions in existence as of the balance sheet date. This rule requires that all entities evaluate subsequent events through the date when financial statements are available to be issued, while a public company should continue to do so through the date when the financial statements are actually filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Examples of situations calling for the adjustment of financial statements are:
If there are subsequent events that provide new information about conditions that did not exist as of the balance sheet date, and for which the information arose before the financial statements were available to be issued or were issued, these events should not be recognized in the financial statements. Examples of situations that do not trigger an adjustment to the financial statements if they occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued are:
A company should disclose the date through which there has been an evaluation of subsequent events, as well as either the date when the financial statements were issued or when they were available to be issued. There may be situations where the non-reporting of a subsequent event would result in misleading financial statements. If so, disclose the nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effect. If a business reissues its financial statements, disclose the dates through which it has evaluated subsequent events, both for the previously issued and revised financial statements. Consistency in Disclosing Subsequent EventsThe recognition of subsequent events in financial statements can be quite subjective in many instances. Given the amount of time required to revise financial statements at the last minute, it is worthwhile to strongly consider whether the circumstances of a subsequent event can be construed as not requiring the revision of financial statements. There is a danger in inconsistently applying the subsequent event rules, so that similar events do not always result in the same treatment of the financial statements. Consequently, it is best to adopt internal rules regarding which events will always lead to the revision of financial statements; these rules will likely require continual updating, as the business encounters new subsequent events that had not previously been incorporated into its rules. Example of a Subsequent Events DisclosureThe following is an example of a typical disclosure of a subsequent event: The following events and transactions occurred subsequent to December 31, 20XX:
What are the types of subsequent events the auditor should identify?There are two types of subsequent events:. Adjusting events. An event that provides additional information about pre-existing conditions that existed on the balance sheet date.. Non-adjusting events. A subsequent event that provides new information about a condition that did not exist on the balance sheet date.. What are Type 1 and Type 2 subsequent events?Type I subsequent events provide evidence about conditions that existed on or before the balance sheet date. These events are recognized in the financial statements. Type II subsequent events provide evidence about conditions that did not exist on or before the balance sheet date.
What are subsequent events in auditing?For the purposes of ISA 560, subsequent events are those events that occur between the reporting date and the date of approval of the financial statements and the signing of the auditor's report.
Why is consideration of subsequent events an important part of the audit?Subsequent events are a key examinable area in auditing papers and it is crucial that students have an understanding of the types of audit evidence that the auditor should obtain to confirm that the accounting and disclosure requirements (particularly in IAS 10) have been applied correctly within the financial ...
|